The International journal of eating disorders · 2020
Treatment interventions for Severe and Enduring Eating Disorders: Systematic review.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kotilahti Emilia, West Madeline, Isomaa Rasmus, Karhunen Leila, Rocks Tetyana, Ruusunen Anu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Approximately 20% of people with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and 10% with Bulimia Nervosa (BN) will eventually develop a long-standing illness. Although there is no set definition for Severe and Enduring eating Disorder (SE-ED), the common criteria relate to a long duration of the disorder and a number of unsuccessful treatment attempts. Research evidence for treatment of SE-ED remains limited, thus the objective of this systematic review was to describe different treatment interventions and their effects on SE-ED-related outcomes.
METHOD: A systematic search for quantitative treatment studies of adult participants with SE-ED was conducted in June 2019 (PROSPERO, CRD42018115802) with no restriction on eating disorder type. Altogether, 2,938 studies were included for title and abstract screening.
RESULTS: After systematic searches and article screening, 23 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 3 open-label studies, 8 naturalistic follow-up studies, 8 case series and case studies, and 1 partially blinded pilot study) were included in the analysis and data extraction. Methodological quality of the included studies was generally low. Inpatient treatment programs (n = 5) were effective in short-term symptom reduction, but long-term results were inconsistent. Outpatient and day-hospital treatment programs (n = 5) seemed promising for symptom reduction. Drug interventions (n = 5) showed some benefits, especially as adjuvant therapies. Brain stimulation (n = 6) led to improvements in depressive symptoms. Other treatments (n = 2) produced mixed results.
DISCUSSION: This is the first systematic review to examine all of the different treatment interventions that have been studied in SE-ED. The results will inform future interventions in research and clinical practice.
METHOD: A systematic search for quantitative treatment studies of adult participants with SE-ED was conducted in June 2019 (PROSPERO, CRD42018115802) with no restriction on eating disorder type. Altogether, 2,938 studies were included for title and abstract screening.
RESULTS: After systematic searches and article screening, 23 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 3 open-label studies, 8 naturalistic follow-up studies, 8 case series and case studies, and 1 partially blinded pilot study) were included in the analysis and data extraction. Methodological quality of the included studies was generally low. Inpatient treatment programs (n = 5) were effective in short-term symptom reduction, but long-term results were inconsistent. Outpatient and day-hospital treatment programs (n = 5) seemed promising for symptom reduction. Drug interventions (n = 5) showed some benefits, especially as adjuvant therapies. Brain stimulation (n = 6) led to improvements in depressive symptoms. Other treatments (n = 2) produced mixed results.
DISCUSSION: This is the first systematic review to examine all of the different treatment interventions that have been studied in SE-ED. The results will inform future interventions in research and clinical practice.