Added value of inflammatory plasma biomarkers to pathologic biomarkers in predicting preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND

Plasma biomarkers have recently emerged for the diagnosis, assessment, and disease monitoring of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but have yet to be fully validated in preclinical AD. In addition to AD pathologic plasma biomarkers (amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) species), a proteomic panel can discriminate between symptomatic AD and cognitively unimpaired older adults in a dementia clinic population.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the added value of a plasma proteomic panel, validated in symptomatic AD, over standard AD pathologic plasma biomarkers and demographic and genetic (apolipoprotein (APOE) ɛ4 status) risk factors in detecting preclinical AD.

METHODS

125 cognitively unimpaired older adults (mean age = 66 years) who completed Aβ PET and plasma draw were analyzed using multiple regression with Aβ PET status (positive versus negative) as the outcome to determine the best fit for predicting preclinical AD. Model 1 included age, education, and gender. Model 2 and 3 added predictors APOE ɛ4 status (carrier versus non-carrier) and AD pathologic blood biomarkers (Aβ42/40 ratio, p-tau181), respectively. Random forest modeling established the 5 proteomic markers from the proteomic panel that best predicted Aβ PET status, and these markers were added in Model 4.

RESULTS

The best model for predicting Aβ PET status included age, years of education, APOE ɛ4 status, Aβ42/40 ratio, and p-tau181. Adding the top 5 proteomic markers did not significantly improve the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Proteomic markers in plasma did not add predictive value to standard AD pathologic plasma biomarkers in predicting preclinical AD in this sample.