Journal of clinical nursing · 2024
Criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of psychiatric home care-mobile team: A systematic review of the literature.
СтатьяСистематический обзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Adrien Vladimir, Diot Thomas
Аннотация
AIM: To explore criteria evaluating the effectiveness of psychiatric home care-mobile team practices, that have been developed widely in the last decades.
DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature.
METHODS: We included 24 studies published between January 2010 and October 2023.
DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Embase, Scopus and PubMed.
RESULTS: The evaluation criteria differed according to the studies: impact on hospital stay, symptomatic clinical impact, repercussions on functioning, quality of life, analysis of profitability, safety, therapeutic alliance and finally, cooperation network.
CONCLUSION: The variability of the criteria used to judge the effectiveness of psychiatric home care-mobile team practices shows their richness and diversity, and the absence of standardisation.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: The variability of the criteria used to judge the effectiveness of psychiatric home care-mobile team practices supports a qualitative and multidisciplinary approach, with enhanced teamwork.
IMPACT: Psychiatric home care-mobile team practice have widely developed in the last years and their effectiveness need to be evaluated. Our main finding is that there is a rich variety of practices and that evaluation criteria are very diverse, thus not standardised. We suggest using a mixed-method approach to capture the subjective experience of patients and caregivers. These findings also highlight the significance of institutional cooperative work and call for a redefinition of team construction.
REPORTING METHOD: The authors adhered to PRISMA guidelines.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature.
METHODS: We included 24 studies published between January 2010 and October 2023.
DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Embase, Scopus and PubMed.
RESULTS: The evaluation criteria differed according to the studies: impact on hospital stay, symptomatic clinical impact, repercussions on functioning, quality of life, analysis of profitability, safety, therapeutic alliance and finally, cooperation network.
CONCLUSION: The variability of the criteria used to judge the effectiveness of psychiatric home care-mobile team practices shows their richness and diversity, and the absence of standardisation.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: The variability of the criteria used to judge the effectiveness of psychiatric home care-mobile team practices supports a qualitative and multidisciplinary approach, with enhanced teamwork.
IMPACT: Psychiatric home care-mobile team practice have widely developed in the last years and their effectiveness need to be evaluated. Our main finding is that there is a rich variety of practices and that evaluation criteria are very diverse, thus not standardised. We suggest using a mixed-method approach to capture the subjective experience of patients and caregivers. These findings also highlight the significance of institutional cooperative work and call for a redefinition of team construction.
REPORTING METHOD: The authors adhered to PRISMA guidelines.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.