MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000437049

Медицинская библиотека · Case reports in oncology · 2015

Ureteroscopy-Assisted Biopsy for a Retroperitoneal Tumor: A Case Report.

Maeda Yoko, Kawahara Takashi, Tanabe Mikiko, Kumano Yohei, Ohtaka Mari, Kondo Takuya, Mochizuki Taku, Hattori Yusuke, Teranishi Jun-Ichi, Miyoshi Yasuhide, Yumura Yasushi, Inayama Yoshiaki, Yao Masahiro, Uemura Hiroji

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Retroperitoneal tumor is often seen in urology clinical practice. To diagnose the tumor, tumor specimens must be obtained. However, in some cases, the tumor is penetrated by vessels around the ureter, and it may be difficult to detect the optimal spot for obtaining a specimen, even when performing open surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old male patient was referred to our hospital for further examination of left back pain due to hydronephrosis. Enhanced computed tomography demonstrated ureter stenosis in front of the ilium, which was surrounded by a retroperitoneal tumor. The tumor was penetrated by blood vessels; therefore, we performed an open surgical biopsy on the suspicion of a retroperitoneal tumor using ureteroscopic assistance. The diagnosis of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis was made according to the biopsy.

CONCLUSION

We herein report the first case of a ureteroscopy-assisted biopsy for the pathological diagnosis of a retroperitoneal tumor.

Для цитирования: Maeda Yoko, Kawahara Takashi, Tanabe Mikiko, Kumano Yohei, Ohtaka Mari, Kondo Takuya, Mochizuki Taku, Hattori Yusuke, Teranishi Jun-Ichi, Miyoshi Yasuhide, Yumura Yasushi, Inayama Yoshiaki, Yao Masahiro, Uemura Hiroji. Ureteroscopy-Assisted Biopsy for a Retroperitoneal Tumor: A Case Report.. Case reports in oncology. 2015. DOI: 10.1159/000437049.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.