MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2746/042516408x335711

Медицинская библиотека · Equine veterinary journal · 2008

Histological and ultrastructural evidence that recurrent laryngeal neuropathy is a bilateral mononeuropathy limited to recurrent laryngeal nerves.

Hahn C N, Matiasek K, Dixon P M, Molony V, Rodenacker K, Mayhew I G

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Recurrent laryngeal neuropathy (RLN) is a common and debilitating peripheral nerve disease of horses, but it remains unclear if this disease is a mono- or polyneuropathy. An understanding of the distribution of the neuropathological lesions in RLN affected horses is fundamental to studying the aetiology of this very significant disease of tall horses.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether RLN should be classified as a mono- or polyneuropathy.

METHODS

Multiple long peripheral nerves and their innervated muscles were examined systematically in 3 clinically affected RLN horses

RESULTS

Severe lesions were evident in the left as well as right recurrent laryngeal nerves in all horses, both distally and, in one case, also proximally. No primary axonal lesions were evident in other nerves nor were changes found in their innervated muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

RLN is not a polyneuropathy but should be classified as a bilateral mononeuropathy.

POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: Genetic and local factors specifically affecting the recurrent laryngeal nerves in RLN-affected horses should now be investigated further.

Для цитирования: Hahn C N, Matiasek K, Dixon P M, Molony V, Rodenacker K, Mayhew I G. Histological and ultrastructural evidence that recurrent laryngeal neuropathy is a bilateral mononeuropathy limited to recurrent laryngeal nerves.. Equine veterinary journal. 2008. DOI: 10.2746/042516408x335711.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.