The diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenitis.
Аннотация
Background/aim: Mediastinal lymph nodes are the second most commonly affected lymph nodes in tuberculous lymphadenitis. It is often difficult to diagnose tuberculosis in patients with lymphadenopathy without parenchymal lesions. The aim of this study was to describe the diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in patients with isolated mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenitis (MTLA). Materials and methods: This study included 527 patients who had undergone EBUS-TBNA between December 2012 and December 2014. Patients with the final diagnosis of MTLA were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA were calculated.
Results
The prevalence of MTLA in all patients who had undergone EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology was 5.2% (28/527). EBUS-TBNA was diagnostic in 21/28 (75%) patients, and the remaining 7 patients required additional procedures for confirmation of diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of combined cytopathological and microbiological examinations of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of MTLA were 87.5%, 98.5%, 91.4%, 98%, and 94.4%, respectively. There were no major complications.
Conclusion
EBUS-TBNA is a safe and effective procedure for the diagnosis of MTLA. When microbiological and cytopathological examinations of samples are combined, EBUS-TBNA demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy and NPV for the diagnosis of MTLA.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.