Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 1996
Effects of ablation diameter, depth, and edge contour on the outcome of photorefractive keratectomy.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
O'Brart D P, Corbett M C, Verma S, Heacock G, Oliver K M, Lohmann C P, Kerr Muir M G, Marshall J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of the ablation diameter, depth, and edge contour on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in which 60 patients (60 eyes) were randomly allocated to 5.00-mm, 6.00-mm, or 5.00 to 6.00-mm multizone treatment groups. All eyes underwent a -6.00 diopter (D) correction using a Summit Omnimed excimer laser.
RESULTS: In eyes treated with 6.00-mm diameter zones, the initial hyperopic shift was reduced, with significant differences at 1 and 4 weeks (p < 0.01). At 6 and 12 months, the refractive changes were closer to the intended correction with 6.00-mm diameters. The predictability of PRK was improved with 6.00-mm zones, with a significant reduction in variance of the refractive changes, at all stages postoperatively (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). Objective measurements of haze were significantly less at 1, 3, and 6 months with 6.00-mm ablations (p < 0.05). There were no differences between the 5.00-mm and the 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone groups. Computerized measurements of "night" halo were significantly smaller in the 6.00-mm treatment group at 1 week and 1 month (p < 0.05). At 12 months, two patients treated with 5.00-mm zones and three with the 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone complained of severe night vision disturbances. No 6.00-mm eyes were similarly affected.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a 6.00-mm spherical ablation diameter produced less initial overcorrection, improved predictability, and was associated with a reduction in postoperative halos and night vision disturbances. Creating a superficial blend zone with a 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone treatment had no beneficial effect on the outcome.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in which 60 patients (60 eyes) were randomly allocated to 5.00-mm, 6.00-mm, or 5.00 to 6.00-mm multizone treatment groups. All eyes underwent a -6.00 diopter (D) correction using a Summit Omnimed excimer laser.
RESULTS: In eyes treated with 6.00-mm diameter zones, the initial hyperopic shift was reduced, with significant differences at 1 and 4 weeks (p < 0.01). At 6 and 12 months, the refractive changes were closer to the intended correction with 6.00-mm diameters. The predictability of PRK was improved with 6.00-mm zones, with a significant reduction in variance of the refractive changes, at all stages postoperatively (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). Objective measurements of haze were significantly less at 1, 3, and 6 months with 6.00-mm ablations (p < 0.05). There were no differences between the 5.00-mm and the 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone groups. Computerized measurements of "night" halo were significantly smaller in the 6.00-mm treatment group at 1 week and 1 month (p < 0.05). At 12 months, two patients treated with 5.00-mm zones and three with the 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone complained of severe night vision disturbances. No 6.00-mm eyes were similarly affected.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a 6.00-mm spherical ablation diameter produced less initial overcorrection, improved predictability, and was associated with a reduction in postoperative halos and night vision disturbances. Creating a superficial blend zone with a 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone treatment had no beneficial effect on the outcome.