MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/cod.12149

Медицинская библиотека · Contact dermatitis · 2013

Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy--growing epidemic.

Lundov Michael D, Opstrup Morten S, Johansen Jeanne D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of contact allergy to the isothiazolinone preservative methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) in combination with methylisothiazolinone (MI) and MI alone has increased in the last couple of years.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of contact allergy to MI, MCI/MI and benzisothiazolinone (BIT) among patch tested patients at Gentofte Hospital, as well as the use of MI in cosmetic products.

METHODS

Patients patch tested with either MI, MCI/MI or BIT from 2010 to 2012 were included in the study. The MOAHLFA index was registered in all patch tested patients, and relevant exposures were determined in patients with an isothiazolinone allergy. In a market survey, the ingredient labels of cosmetic products were investigated for MI content.

RESULTS

The prevalence of MI and MCI/MI contact allergy increased significantly from 2010 to 2012: from 2.0% to 3.7% for MI (n = 2766), and from 1.0% to 2.4% for MCI/MI (n = 2802). MI-allergic patients had occupational, hand and face dermatitis significantly more often, and were aged > 40 years. Cosmetics were the most common substances causing relevant exposure found in both MCI/MI-allergic and MI-allergic patients. MI was found in 3.3% of cosmetics on the Danish retail market.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in MI contact allergy is alarming, and urgent action is needed.

Для цитирования: Lundov Michael D, Opstrup Morten S, Johansen Jeanne D. Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy--growing epidemic.. Contact dermatitis. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/cod.12149.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.