DOI 10.1097/iae.0000000000003506
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS RETINITIS SCREENING USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGY.
Аннотация
PROPOSE: A screening protocol for cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) by fundus photography was generated, and the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning technology for CMVR screening in HIV patients was investigated.
METHODS
One hundred sixty-five eyes of 90 HIV-positive patients were enrolled and evaluated for CMVR with binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. Then, a single central field of the fundus image was recorded from each eye. All images were then interpreted by both machine learning models, generated by using the Keras application, and by a third-year ophthalmology resident. Diagnostic performance of CMVR screening using a machine learning model and the third-year ophthalmology resident were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS
Machine learning model, Keras application (VGG16), provided 68.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 50%-83.9%) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI = 97.2%-100%) specificity. The program provided accuracy of 93.94%. However, the sensitivity and specificity for the third-year ophthalmology grading were 67.7% (95% CI = 48.6%-83.3%) and 98.4% (95% CI = 94.5%-99.8%). The accuracy for CMVR classification was 89.70%. When considering for sight-threatening retinitis in Zone 1 and excluded Zones 2 and 3, the machine learning model provided high sensitivity of 88.2% (95% CI = 63.6%-98.5%) and high specificity of 100% (95% CI = 97.2%-100%).
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated the benefit of the machine learning model VGG16, which provided high sensitivity and specificity for detecting sight-threatening CMVR in HIV-positive patients. This model is a useful tool for ophthalmologists in clinical practice for preventing blindness from CMVR, especially during the Coronavrus Disease 2019 pandemic.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.