DOI 10.1016/j.jiac.2024.12.001
Dilated common bile duct diameter as an indicator of bacteremia in patients with symptomatic common bile duct stones.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The optimal timing and selection for blood culture collection in patients with acute cholangitis remains unclear. The relationship between common bile duct (CBD) diameter and the incidence of bacteremia in patients with CBD stones was elucidated.
METHODS
This single-center retrospective observational study included patients with symptomatic CBD stones who presented to the emergency department between January 2019 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bacteremia. The patients were divided into two groups based on bacteremia complications. The patient characteristics and CBD diameters were compared between the two groups to identify factors associated with bacteremia.
RESULTS
In total, 270 patients were analyzed, with bacteremia identified in 134 patients (50 %), and the median CBD diameter was 10.7 mm (IQR, 8.7-13.7). The CBD diameter was significantly larger in patients with bacteremia (median 12.4 mm [IQR, 9.9-15.7] vs. 9.7 mm [IQR, 8.2-11.7], P < 0.001) in univariate analysis. Multivariable analysis revealed that the CBD diameter was significantly associated with bacteremia (OR: 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.14-1.38, P < 0.010). The area under the ROC curves, representing the diagnostic accuracy of CBD diameter for indicating bacteremia, was 0.72 (95 % CI, 0.66-0.78) with a cut-off value of 11.2 mm.
CONCLUSION
CBD dilation in patients with symptomatic CBD stones is significantly correlated with bacteremia. The CBD diameter cannot be assessed as the sole tool for detecting bacteremia; however, CBD dilation could be an indicator of bacteremia, assisting in the treatment strategy, regardless of the initial severity of cholangitis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.