MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00464-024-11006-3

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical endoscopy · 2024

Safety of robotic cholecystectomy as index training procedure: the UK experience.

Stefanova Irena, Alkhatib Omar, Sheel Andrea, Alabraba Edward, Alibrahim Mohammad, Arshad Ali, Awan Altaf, Baron Ryan, Bhatti Imran, Bhogal Ricky, Dhakshinamoorthy Vijayanand, Diaz-Nieto Rafael, Dunne Declan, Frampton Adam E, Green Alexander, Hajibandeh Shahin, Hamady Zaed, Horgan Liam, Kissane Eleanor, Krishnan Sailakshmi, Kumar Rajesh, Lahiri Rajiv, Lam Shi, Liau Siong-Seng, Marangoni Gabriele, Moudhgalya Shyam, Papadopoulos Georgios, Pencavel Tim, Picker Sarah, Ramsingh Jason, Riga Angela, Silva Michael, Soonawalla Zahir, Subar Daren, Sud Vikas, Upasani Vivek, Wong Vincent, Worthington Tim, Yeung Kai Tai Derek, Ahmad Jawad

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: To evaluate the safety profile of robotic cholecystectomy performed within the United Kingdom (UK) Robotic Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) training programme.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data from eleven centres participating in the UK Robotic HPB training programme was conducted. All adult patients undergoing robotic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease or gallbladder polyp were considered. Bile duct injury, conversion to open procedure, conversion to subtotal cholecystectomy, length of hospital stay, 30-day re-admission, and post-operative complications were the evaluated outcome parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 600 patients were included. The median age was 53 (IQR 65-41) years and the majority (72.7%; 436/600) were female. The main indications for robotic cholecystectomy were biliary colic (55.5%, 333/600), cholecystitis (18.8%, 113/600), gallbladder polyps (7.7%, 46/600), and pancreatitis (6.2%, 37/600). The median length of stay was 0 (IQR 0-1) days. Of the included patients, 88.5% (531/600) were discharged on the day of procedure with 30-day re-admission rate of 5.5% (33/600). There were no bile duct injuries and the rate of conversion to open was 0.8% (5/600) with subtotal cholecystectomy rate of 0.8% (5/600).

CONCLUSION

The current study confirms that robotic cholecystectomy can be safely implemented to routine practice with a low risk of bile duct injury, low bile leak rate, low conversion to open surgery, and low need for subtotal cholecystectomy.

Для цитирования: Stefanova Irena, Alkhatib Omar, Sheel Andrea, Alabraba Edward, Alibrahim Mohammad, Arshad Ali, Awan Altaf, Baron Ryan, Bhatti Imran, Bhogal Ricky, Dhakshinamoorthy Vijayanand, Diaz-Nieto Rafael, Dunne Declan, Frampton Adam E, Green Alexander, Hajibandeh Shahin, Hamady Zaed, Horgan Liam, Kissane Eleanor, Krishnan Sailakshmi, Kumar Rajesh, Lahiri Rajiv, Lam Shi, Liau Siong-Seng, Marangoni Gabriele, Moudhgalya Shyam, Papadopoulos Georgios, Pencavel Tim, Picker Sarah, Ramsingh Jason, Riga Angela, Silva Michael, Soonawalla Zahir, Subar Daren, Sud Vikas, Upasani Vivek, Wong Vincent, Worthington Tim, Yeung Kai Tai Derek, Ahmad Jawad. Safety of robotic cholecystectomy as index training procedure: the UK experience.. Surgical endoscopy. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11006-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.