MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3400/avd.oa.22-00099

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of vascular diseases · 2022

Useful Test for Classification of Cerebral Infarction at Hospital Specializing in Neurosurgery.

Yoshida Hirotaka, Nishitani Kazutoshi

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background and Purpose: There are many cases of cerebral infarction of unknown etiology in which the embolic sources cannot be identified including atrial fibrillation despite achievement of complete revascularization after thrombectomy. Method: An analysis was conducted for 556 consecutive cases of patients who were hospitalized for cerebral infarction to determine the significance of accurate classification of disease type and investigation into causes of cerebral infarction of unknown cause. Result: According to the Trials of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification, cerebral infarction of other/unknown etiology was observed in 94 cases, of which 22 cases were found to have causes by additional workup. Implantable cardiac monitors were inserted in 15 of 76 cases of cryptogenic cerebral infarction, of which 4 cases (26%) showed detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) during observation period (223-384 days).

Conclusion

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurement, abdomen-pelvic computed tomography (CT), cardiac monitoring for 1 week, and implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) were useful for the classification of disease type and detection of cryptogenic atrial fibrillation. (This is secondary publication from J Jpn Coll Angiol 2021; 61: 49-55.).

Для цитирования: Yoshida Hirotaka, Nishitani Kazutoshi. Useful Test for Classification of Cerebral Infarction at Hospital Specializing in Neurosurgery.. Annals of vascular diseases. 2022. DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.22-00099.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.