A Mendelian randomization study on the causal effects of circulating cytokines on the risk of vitiligo.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Accumulating evidence reveals an association between circulating cytokine levels and vitiligo. However, the causal association between circulating cytokine levels and vitiligo remains unrevealed.
METHODS
We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using a genome-wide association study of the 41 cytokines dataset, which was conducted with 3 Finnish cohorts (n = 8,293). Vitiligo data were acquired from strictly defined vitiligo data collected by FinnGenbiobank analysis, which included 207,613 European ancestors (131 vitiligo patients, 207,482 controls). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, weighted median (WME), simple model, weighted model, and MR-Egger were used to determine the changes in vitiligo pathogenic cytokine taxa, followed by sensitivity analysis, including horizontal pleiotropy analysis. The MR Steiger test evaluated the strength of a causal association, and the leave-one-out method was used to assess the reliability of the results. The possibility of reverse causality was also investigated using a reverse MR study.
RESULTS
We observed that rising IL-4 levels generated an enhanced probability of vitiligo in IVW (OR 2.72, 95%CI 1.19-6.22, p = 0.018). According to the results of the MR analysis, there were causal links between IL-4 and vitiligo. Results were steady after sensitivity and heterogeneity analyses.
CONCLUSION
Our research reveals that a genetically determined increased level of circulating IL-4 may be linked to a higher risk of developing vitiligo. The development of innovative treatment approaches (such as tofacitinib or dupilumab) that focus on blocking IL-4 as a novel way of preventing and treating vitiligo is significantly impacted by our findings.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.