The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2020
Platelet-rich plasma as a therapy for androgenic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Evans Adam G, Mwangi James M, Pope Rand W, Ivanic Mirjana G, Botros Mina A, Glassman Gabriella E, Pearce F Bennett, Kassis Salam
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The past decade has seen platelet-rich plasma (PRP) become a popular therapy around the world as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia (AGA). These systematic review and meta-analyses assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of PRP to determine the role of PRP as a treatment for AGA among the other non-surgical treatment modalities.
METHODS: This study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and is registered under the PROSPERO ID CRD42019136329. Seven databases were searched from inception through May 2019. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to evaluate the effect of PRP treatments on hair density and hair thickness.
RESULTS: Thirty studies, including 687 patients, met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine studies reported beneficial results, and 24 studies reached statistical significance on a measured outcome. Ten RCTs were included. Our meta-analyses show that PRP treatment increases hair density and hair thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: PRP is an autologous treatment that lacks serious adverse effects and effectively improves hair density and hair thickness in men and women with AGA. Future research should include low risk-of-bias RCTs to optimize treatment protocols, investigate variability among studies, and to obtain more data on hair thickness changes.
METHODS: This study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and is registered under the PROSPERO ID CRD42019136329. Seven databases were searched from inception through May 2019. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to evaluate the effect of PRP treatments on hair density and hair thickness.
RESULTS: Thirty studies, including 687 patients, met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine studies reported beneficial results, and 24 studies reached statistical significance on a measured outcome. Ten RCTs were included. Our meta-analyses show that PRP treatment increases hair density and hair thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: PRP is an autologous treatment that lacks serious adverse effects and effectively improves hair density and hair thickness in men and women with AGA. Future research should include low risk-of-bias RCTs to optimize treatment protocols, investigate variability among studies, and to obtain more data on hair thickness changes.