MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.yct.0000169503.80981.c9

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of ECT · 2005

ECT practice in Japan.

Chanpattana Worrawat, Kojima Kasuki, Kramer Barry Alan, Intakorn Aim, Sasaki Satoshi, Kitphati Rungrueng

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the characteristics of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) practice in Japan. Only by knowing practice patterns can standards of care be successfully developed and implemented.

METHODS

From September 1, 2001, to August 31, 2003, a questionnaire was sent to 248 institutions.

RESULTS

A total of 100 institutions (40.3%) completed the questionnaire. ECT was available in 83 institutions. A total of 1,210 patients received 11,146 ECTs from 895 psychiatrists. Brief-pulse device was used in 21 institutions. EEG monitoring was used routinely in 15 institutions. Bilateral ECT was always used. Patients who received ECT were diagnosed schizophrenia (48.9%), major depression (37.4%), catatonia (6.8%), mania (4.4%), and dysthymia (0.8%). The majority of patients who received ECT were in the age group 45-64 years (40.4%) and 65 years and older (39.3%). A total of 670 patients received a total of 6364 unmodified ECT at 60 institutions. There were no ECT-related deaths during the survey.

CONCLUSION

ECT use in Japan is low. More than half of ECTs instituted were unmodified. The majority of patients who received ECT were diagnosed with schizophrenia and major depression.

Для цитирования: Chanpattana Worrawat, Kojima Kasuki, Kramer Barry Alan, Intakorn Aim, Sasaki Satoshi, Kitphati Rungrueng. ECT practice in Japan.. The journal of ECT. 2005. DOI: 10.1097/01.yct.0000169503.80981.c9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.