The British journal of radiology · 2020
Comparison of 3D T1-SPACE and DSA in evaluation of intracranial in-stent restenosis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shao Qiuji, Li Qiang, Wu Qiaowei, Li Tianxiao, Li Li, Chang Kaitao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: In-stent restenosis (ISR) after stenting for intracranial stenosis is a significant issue. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the 3D T1-SPACE technique in the follow-up of patients after stent implantation.
METHODS: Fifteen patients with intracranial arterial stenosis were prospectively enrolled 6-8 months after stenting. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and 3D T1-SPACE imaging were performed to evaluate the degree of stenosis and the enhancement of the vessel wall. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between the two imaging methods, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated as a measure of the linear correlation.
RESULTS: Eight Enterprise stents and seven Wingspan stents were used in 15 patients. The follow-up DSA after 6-8 months showed that the degree of stenosis was 40% (range, 30-72%), and ISR occurred in 4 of 15 (26.7%) lesions. The degree of stenosis assessed using the 3D T1-SPACE imaging technique was 35% (range, 30-75%). All four patients with ISR demonstrated significant enhancement. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.959 (p < 0.05), and the Bland-Altman plot showed that all data points were within the consistency limits ([Formula: see text] ± 1.96 s).
CONCLUSION: As a non-invasive imaging modality, 3D T1-SPACE showed great consistency with DSA in measuring the degree of stenosis after intracranial stenting. It may be used as an optional method for detecting ISR.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study evaluated the usefulness of 3D T1-SPACE technique in the follow-up of patients after stent implantation, which could be used as an optional and non-invasive method in detection of in-stent restenosis.
METHODS: Fifteen patients with intracranial arterial stenosis were prospectively enrolled 6-8 months after stenting. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and 3D T1-SPACE imaging were performed to evaluate the degree of stenosis and the enhancement of the vessel wall. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between the two imaging methods, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated as a measure of the linear correlation.
RESULTS: Eight Enterprise stents and seven Wingspan stents were used in 15 patients. The follow-up DSA after 6-8 months showed that the degree of stenosis was 40% (range, 30-72%), and ISR occurred in 4 of 15 (26.7%) lesions. The degree of stenosis assessed using the 3D T1-SPACE imaging technique was 35% (range, 30-75%). All four patients with ISR demonstrated significant enhancement. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.959 (p < 0.05), and the Bland-Altman plot showed that all data points were within the consistency limits ([Formula: see text] ± 1.96 s).
CONCLUSION: As a non-invasive imaging modality, 3D T1-SPACE showed great consistency with DSA in measuring the degree of stenosis after intracranial stenting. It may be used as an optional method for detecting ISR.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study evaluated the usefulness of 3D T1-SPACE technique in the follow-up of patients after stent implantation, which could be used as an optional and non-invasive method in detection of in-stent restenosis.