MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0377-1237(17)30964-4

Медицинская библиотека · Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2017

NESTED CASE - CONTROL ANALYSIS OF THE RISK FACTORS FOR HIGH ALTITUDE PULMONARY OEDEMA.

Bhalwar Rajvir, Singh Randhir, Ahuja R C, Misra R P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A nested case-control study was undertaken on a cohort of soldiers inducted into high altitude area (11000 to 16000 feet) of Western Himalayas, with the objectives of studying the incidence of high altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPO) and its association with physical exertion and certain other predetermined risk factors. The study indicated that the cumulative incidence of HAPO was 1.42 per 1000 inductions. The association with moderate/strenuous physical exertion within 24 hours of entry into high altitude was significant (Odds ratio (OR) = 3.19; 95% confidence limits (CL) = 1.23 to 8.15); however, this association was not significant for the period 24 to 48 hours or > 48 hours. Physical exertion during first 24 hours was also significantly associated with severity of disease (OR = 14.67, 95% CL = 3.61 to 64.04), but not after 24 hours. Previous history of "high altitude sickness" was also significantly associated with HAPO (OR = 2.74, 95% CL = 1.12 to 6.77). Physical exertion during first 24 hours was found to carry an attributable risk of 2.56 per 1000 inductions and an etiologic fraction of 17.8%. No significant association of HAPO was observed with age, type of inductee (fresh/reinductee), native place, alcohol consumption and smoking.

Для цитирования: Bhalwar Rajvir, Singh Randhir, Ahuja R C, Misra R P. NESTED CASE - CONTROL ANALYSIS OF THE RISK FACTORS FOR HIGH ALTITUDE PULMONARY OEDEMA.. Medical journal, Armed Forces India. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/s0377-1237(17)30964-4.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.