Digital biomarkers · 2026
Facial Expression and Predicting and Monitoring Response to Depression Treatment: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Plevin David, Hartmann Simon, Schubert K Oliver, Chen Leo, Clark Scott R
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The identification of biomarkers for treatment response in major depression is critical to the further development of personalized treatment. There is a recognized relationship between facial expression and depression of mood, and previous literature also indicates that facial expression is associated with treatment outcomes in depression. This suggests that facial expression may have use as a biomarker for treatment response. There is no previous synthesis of related research to drive the development of new digital approaches.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using three databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, and PsycINFO), identifying English-language publications (journal articles or books) that assessed either facial muscle activity or expression as predictors of treatment response or correlates of treatment outcome in depression. Risk of bias was assessed using a National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool.
RESULTS: We identified 12 studies, involving a total of 389 participants, which used a variety of different assessment methods and thus assessment outcomes, including electromyography, observer-related assessments (including Facial Action Coding System), and automated tools of facial expression assessment. Depression treatment response correlated with an increase in facial expressivity. Greater activity in the corrugator and zygomatic muscles, and lower levels of lip tightening and downward lip movement, may predict treatment response.
CONCLUSIONS: Included studies were limited by heterogeneity in facial expression assessment tools and outcomes, along with demographic homogeneity. The findings of the review suggest that facial expression analysis may offer an avenue for biomarkers of depression status and treatment response prediction.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using three databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, and PsycINFO), identifying English-language publications (journal articles or books) that assessed either facial muscle activity or expression as predictors of treatment response or correlates of treatment outcome in depression. Risk of bias was assessed using a National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool.
RESULTS: We identified 12 studies, involving a total of 389 participants, which used a variety of different assessment methods and thus assessment outcomes, including electromyography, observer-related assessments (including Facial Action Coding System), and automated tools of facial expression assessment. Depression treatment response correlated with an increase in facial expressivity. Greater activity in the corrugator and zygomatic muscles, and lower levels of lip tightening and downward lip movement, may predict treatment response.
CONCLUSIONS: Included studies were limited by heterogeneity in facial expression assessment tools and outcomes, along with demographic homogeneity. The findings of the review suggest that facial expression analysis may offer an avenue for biomarkers of depression status and treatment response prediction.