Transfusion · 2018
High immunogenicity of red blood cell antigens restricted to the population of African descent in a cohort of sickle cell disease patients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Floch Aline, Gien Dominique, Tournamille Christophe, Chami Btissam, Habibi Anoosha, Galactéros Frédéric, Bierling Philippe, Djoudi Rachid, Pondarré Corinne, Peyrard Thierry, Pirenne France
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients undergo multiple red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and are regularly exposed to low-prevalence (LP) antigens specific to individuals of African descent. This study evaluated the prevalence of antibodies against LP antigens in SCD patients and the need to identify these antibodies in everyday practice.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma from 211 SCD patients was tested with RBCs expressing the following LP antigens: RH10 (V), RH20 (VS), RH23 (DW ), RH30 (Goa ), KEL6 (Jsa ), and MNS6 (He).
RESULTS: Nine LP antibodies were found in eight patients (3.8%): five anti-RH23, two anti-RH30, and two anti-MNS6. The exposure risk, calculated for each LP antigen, was below 3% per RBC unit, for all antigens tested. Thus, in this cohort of transfused SCD patients, the prevalence of LP antibodies was similar to that of antibodies against antigens of the FY, JK, and MNS blood group systems. These findings also reveal the occurrence of anti-RH23 in SCD patients. No anti-RH20 or anti-KEL6 were found, despite the high frequency of mismatch situations.
CONCLUSION: These results highlight the immunogenicity of these LP antigens, and the evanescence of antibodies against LP antigens. They also highlight the importance of appropriate pretransfusion testing for patients frequently transfused, who are likely to be exposed to multiple types of blood group antigens.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma from 211 SCD patients was tested with RBCs expressing the following LP antigens: RH10 (V), RH20 (VS), RH23 (DW ), RH30 (Goa ), KEL6 (Jsa ), and MNS6 (He).
RESULTS: Nine LP antibodies were found in eight patients (3.8%): five anti-RH23, two anti-RH30, and two anti-MNS6. The exposure risk, calculated for each LP antigen, was below 3% per RBC unit, for all antigens tested. Thus, in this cohort of transfused SCD patients, the prevalence of LP antibodies was similar to that of antibodies against antigens of the FY, JK, and MNS blood group systems. These findings also reveal the occurrence of anti-RH23 in SCD patients. No anti-RH20 or anti-KEL6 were found, despite the high frequency of mismatch situations.
CONCLUSION: These results highlight the immunogenicity of these LP antigens, and the evanescence of antibodies against LP antigens. They also highlight the importance of appropriate pretransfusion testing for patients frequently transfused, who are likely to be exposed to multiple types of blood group antigens.