MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery · 1991

[A case of meningioangiomatosis in an infant].

Oka Y, Sakaki S, Yamashita M, Nakagawa K, Matsuoka K, Matsui H

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We report here a rare case of meningioangiomatosis in an infant, not associated with von Recklinghausen's disease. A 14-month-old female was admitted because of seizures. Neurological findings on admission were normal. Computed tomography showed a slightly high density mass with marked contrast enhancement in the left temporoparietal lobe. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) revealed a slightly hypointensive lesion surrounded by an isointensive band on T1-weighted image, and a hyperintensive lesion surrounded by a slightly hypointensive band on T2-weighted image. Brain edema was shown to a certain extent around the lesion on MRI. Left carotid angiography demonstrated a slightly upward shift of the left middle cerebral artery, but no abnormal vascularity was shown. A temporoparietal craniotomy was performed. A yellowish red, elastic soft tumor was observed in the left temporal lobe. The tumor resembled hyperemic hypertrophic gyri and was well demarcated. Total removal of the tumor was performed. Pathological diagnosis was meningioangiomatosis. The patient is still doing well 3 years and 5 months after the operation. There was no evidence of recurrence on computed tomography at the 3-year follow up. She didn't have any stigmata, such as café au lait spots or neurofibromas suggesting von Recklinghausen's disease.

Для цитирования: Oka Y, Sakaki S, Yamashita M, Nakagawa K, Matsuoka K, Matsui H. [A case of meningioangiomatosis in an infant].. No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery. 1991.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.