MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of medical technology · 1980

A comparison of three methods for quantitation of variant hemoglobin fractions.

Pearce C J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Three methods, cellulose acetate electrophoresis-densitometry (CAE-D), cellulose acetate electrophoresis-elution (CAE-E), and microchromatography (MGC), were evaluated to determine the best method for quantitating variant hemoglobins. Evaluations were performed in two phases. In Phase I samples of known hemoglobins were obtained and Hb S and/or Hb C were quantitated by the three methods to evaluate agreement of results. In Phase II reference samples were prepared. The Hb S concentrations from each method were compared to the reference value to determine the effect of varying concentrations of Hb S on the methods. Cellulose acetate electrophoresis-densitometry proved to be the best method for quantitating variant hemoglobins in which the concentration was greater than 35 percent. Microchromatography was shown to be the best method when Hb S was approximately 30 percent. Either the microchromatography or the cellulose acetate electrophoresis-elution method proved to be a good method for quantitating approximately 25 percent Hb S.

Для цитирования: Pearce C J. A comparison of three methods for quantitation of variant hemoglobin fractions.. The American journal of medical technology. 1980.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.