DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000039768
Successful treatments of idiopathic retinal vasculitis, aneurysms, and neuroretinitis (IRVAN) syndrome-related macular edema and exudation by intravitreal aflibercept injection in a senile patient: A case report.
Аннотация
RATIONALE: The prevalence of idiopathic retinitis, vasculitis, aneurysms, and neuroretinitis (IRVAN) syndrome is <1/1,000,000, and it tends to occur in young women. Panretinal photocoagulation, focal laser photocoagulation, peripheral cryopexy, vitrectomy, and corticosteroid therapy are the traditional treatments. We reported a case of a senile patient with IRVAN syndrome who presented with severe exudation in both eyes and macular edema in the left eye, successfully treated by serial intravitreal aflibercept injections.
PATIENT CONCERNS: A 77-year-old Taiwanese woman complained of progressive blurred vision in the left eye and ocular examinations revealed a visual acuity of 20/125 in the left eye.
DIAGNOSIS: Indirect fundoscopy and fluorescein angiography showed bilateral multiple aneurysms, vasculitis, optic nerve staining, and neovascularizations. In addition, optical coherence tomography demonstrated macular edema with subretinal fluid and exudations in the left eye.
INTERVENTIONS: Monthly intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor with aflibercept 2.0 mg were administered in the left eye.
OUTCOMES: The visual acuity in the left eye improved to 20/50 after 18 months of treatment. Macular edema and subretinal fluid regressed. Furthermore, vessel leakage and optic disc staining also improved.
LESSONS: This case is the first to demonstrate successful treatment of IRVAN syndrome-related central macular edema and exudations, in the absence of neovascularization, using a series of intravitreal aflibercept injections as monotherapy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.