DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.004
Coronary computed tomography angiography for selecting coronary artery bypass graft surgery candidates.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
There have been limited reports on the diagnostic performance and prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for selecting coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) candidates.
METHODS
There were 1,018 patients with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent 64-slice multidetector CCTA between July 2009 and January 2010. Of them, we excluded 324 patients who denied further treatment (n=7), who were lost for unidentified reasons (n=107), or who were transferred to local clinics (n=210). The total analysis cohort consisted of 694 patients. We established eligible CABG criteria defined as three-vessel disease, left main coronary disease, and left main coronary artery equivalent disease. Diagnostic performance was determined using conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard. For assessment of the prognostic utility of CCTA, electronic medical records were reviewed to screen for the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event, defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or revascularization.
RESULTS
The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CCTA for the selection of CABG candidates were 83.3%, 96.2%, 90.9%, and 92.7%, respectively. The presence of CABG criteria on CCTA was an independent prognostic factor for predicting a major adverse cardiac event (hazard ratio, 12.508; 95% confidence interval, 7.353 to 21.278; p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
We found CCTA had a high diagnostic performance for selecting CABG candidates and predicted major adverse cardiac events in CABG candidates referred for CCTA owing to suspected coronary artery disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.