MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10147-024-02570-8

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of clinical oncology · 2024

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022.

Nozawa Kazuki, Ozaki Yukinori, Yoshinami Tetsuhiro, Yokoe Takamichi, Nishio Hiroshi, Tsuchihashi Kenji, Ichihara Eiki, Miura Yuji, Endo Makoto, Yano Shingo, Maruyama Dai, Susumu Nobuyuki, Takekuma Munetaka, Motohashi Takashi, Ito Mamoru, Baba Eishi, Ochi Nobuaki, Kubo Toshio, Uchino Keita, Kimura Takahiro, Kamiyama Yutaro, Nakao Shinji, Tamura Shinobu, Nishimoto Hitomi, Kato Yasuhisa, Sato Atsushi, Takano Toshimi

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy for breast cancer can cause neutropenia, increasing the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and serious infections. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) as primary prophylaxis has been explored to mitigate these risks. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of primary G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted according to the "Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development" using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies assessing using G-CSF as primary prophylaxis in invasive breast cancer were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and FN incidence. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes with sufficient data.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis, and five RCTs were meta-analyzed for FN incidence. The meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in FN incidence with primary G-CSF prophylaxis (risk difference [RD] = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.01-0.43, p = 0.04). Evidence for improvement in OS with G-CSF was inconclusive. Four RCTs suggested a tendency for increased pain with G-CSF, but statistical significance was not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary prophylactic use of G-CSF is strongly recommended for breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, as it has been shown to reduce the incidence of FN. While the impact on OS is unclear, the benefits of reducing FN are considered to outweigh the potential harm of increased pain.

Для цитирования: Nozawa Kazuki, Ozaki Yukinori, Yoshinami Tetsuhiro, Yokoe Takamichi, Nishio Hiroshi, Tsuchihashi Kenji, Ichihara Eiki, Miura Yuji, Endo Makoto, Yano Shingo, Maruyama Dai, Susumu Nobuyuki, Takekuma Munetaka, Motohashi Takashi, Ito Mamoru, Baba Eishi, Ochi Nobuaki, Kubo Toshio, Uchino Keita, Kimura Takahiro, Kamiyama Yutaro, Nakao Shinji, Tamura Shinobu, Nishimoto Hitomi, Kato Yasuhisa, Sato Atsushi, Takano Toshimi. Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022.. International journal of clinical oncology. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02570-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.