Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
Effectiveness of personalized continuous care in wound care of patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mi Yan, Wang Jing
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a common complication of diabetes, are often accompanied by delayed wound healing, pain, psychological distress, and sleep disturbances.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of personalized continuous care (PCC) compared to routine care in improving wound healing, symptom severity, and psychological/sleep outcomes in DFU patients.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 60 DFU patients (2021-2024) compared PCC (n=30) with routine care (n=30). Outcomes assessed included wound area reduction, granulation tissue coverage, symptom scores (ulceration, necrosis, pain), and validated psychological (SDS, SAS) and sleep (AIS) scales.
RESULTS: The PCC group showed superior wound healing (40.51% vs. 27.43% area reduction; 61.66% vs. 46.32% granulation coverage, p<0.05), lower symptom scores (ulceration: 3.18 ± 0.45 vs. 4.46 ± 0.6; pain: 2.01 ± 0.29 vs. 3.45 ± 0.58, p<0.01), and improved psychological (SDS: 32.1 ± 3.88 vs. 44.87 ± 4.05; SAS: 30.36 ± 3.77 vs. 43.25 ± 4.56, p<0.001) and sleep outcomes (AIS: 8.23 ± 0.6 vs. 11.33 ± 0.94, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: PCC enhances DFU wound healing, alleviates symptoms, and improves psychological well-being and sleep quality, supporting its integration routine clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of personalized continuous care (PCC) compared to routine care in improving wound healing, symptom severity, and psychological/sleep outcomes in DFU patients.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 60 DFU patients (2021-2024) compared PCC (n=30) with routine care (n=30). Outcomes assessed included wound area reduction, granulation tissue coverage, symptom scores (ulceration, necrosis, pain), and validated psychological (SDS, SAS) and sleep (AIS) scales.
RESULTS: The PCC group showed superior wound healing (40.51% vs. 27.43% area reduction; 61.66% vs. 46.32% granulation coverage, p<0.05), lower symptom scores (ulceration: 3.18 ± 0.45 vs. 4.46 ± 0.6; pain: 2.01 ± 0.29 vs. 3.45 ± 0.58, p<0.01), and improved psychological (SDS: 32.1 ± 3.88 vs. 44.87 ± 4.05; SAS: 30.36 ± 3.77 vs. 43.25 ± 4.56, p<0.001) and sleep outcomes (AIS: 8.23 ± 0.6 vs. 11.33 ± 0.94, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: PCC enhances DFU wound healing, alleviates symptoms, and improves psychological well-being and sleep quality, supporting its integration routine clinical practice.