DOI 10.1097/00003226-200203000-00013
A laboratory model for microkeratome-assisted posterior lamellar keratoplasty utilizing a running graft suture and a sutureless hinged flap.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in anterior corneal curvature and graft stability with different sized donor buttons in a laboratory model of posterior lamellar keratoplasty.
METHODS
Thirty-six human eye bank corneas (18 donors and 18 recipients) were mounted on an artificial anterior chamber. A manual microkeratome was used to create a hinged anterior lamellar keratectomy. A 7.0-mm diameter posterior lamellar disk (posterior stroma, Descemet's membrane, and endothelium) was then trephinated from the recipient cornea. Three different sizes (7.0, 7.25, and 7.5 mm) of donor buttons were compared. They were sutured into the recipient bed with a running 10-0 nylon suture and covered by the host corneal flap. The flap was replaced without sutures. The resulting endokeratoplasty was analyzed by computerized videokeratography and tonometry.
RESULTS
Regular postoperative astigmatism was present in all cases. There was an average increase in astigmatism of 1.47 +/- 1.49 diopters (D) postoperatively. The mean change in the average keratometry readings was -5.12 +/- 6.12 D. The grafts and flaps maintained watertight seals with average leak pressures of 66.9 +/- 46.4 mm Hg. Although donor buttons oversized by 0.5 mm had the least change in average keratometry reading, those oversized by 0.25 mm had the best stability at high pressure. All groups had little change in astigmatism.
CONCLUSION
The optimal sized button of those tested would be either oversized by 0.25 or 0.5 mm. This new surgical technique may result in lower risk of high and irregular astigmatism in the management of corneal endothelial disorders.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.