Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica · 1997
Metastatic bacterial endophthalmitis. A report of four cases all leading to blindness.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Piczenik Y, Kjer B, Fledelius H C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To draw attention to the rare but severe entity of endophthalmitis as encountered due to metastatic spread of bacteria.
METHODS: We report our experience from four cases of metastatic bacterial endophthalmitis.
RESULTS: Systemic infection (Pneumococcus meningitis) was evident in two cases, but in the other two there was no early clue to systemic infection. Eventually, however, endocardial vegetations were disclosed as the source of bacterial emboli (E.coli, peptostreptococcus). In the most atypical patient, magnetic resonance scanning had indicated disseminated brain tumours, and only autopsy revealed the infectious nature of the disease. Ocular ultrasonography being part of the work-up, the four eyes under study all showed marked morphological intraocular changes, including 'solid tumour' in the presumed neoplastic case.
CONCLUSION: Our cases stress the severity of metastatic bacterial endophthalmitis and the easily missed early diagnosis, even where experienced clinicians are involved. The role of diagnostic ultrasound is discussed.
METHODS: We report our experience from four cases of metastatic bacterial endophthalmitis.
RESULTS: Systemic infection (Pneumococcus meningitis) was evident in two cases, but in the other two there was no early clue to systemic infection. Eventually, however, endocardial vegetations were disclosed as the source of bacterial emboli (E.coli, peptostreptococcus). In the most atypical patient, magnetic resonance scanning had indicated disseminated brain tumours, and only autopsy revealed the infectious nature of the disease. Ocular ultrasonography being part of the work-up, the four eyes under study all showed marked morphological intraocular changes, including 'solid tumour' in the presumed neoplastic case.
CONCLUSION: Our cases stress the severity of metastatic bacterial endophthalmitis and the easily missed early diagnosis, even where experienced clinicians are involved. The role of diagnostic ultrasound is discussed.