MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1164/rccm.202107-1709oc

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022

Randomized Clinical Study of Temporary Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Difficult-to-Wean Patients.

Dres Martin, de Abreu Marcelo Gama, Merdji Hamid, Müller-Redetzky Holger, Dellweg Dominic, Randerath Winfried J, Mortaza Satar, Jung Boris, Bruells Christian, Moerer Onnen, Scharffenberg Martin, Jaber Samir, Besset Sébastien, Bitter Thomas, Geise Arnim, Heine Alexander, Malfertheiner Maximilian V, Kortgen Andreas, Benzaquen Jonathan, Nelson Teresa, Uhrig Alexander, Moenig Olaf, Meziani Ferhat, Demoule Alexandre, Similowski Thomas, RESCUE-2 Study Group Investigators

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Rationale: Diaphragm dysfunction is frequently observed in critically ill patients with difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Objectives

To evaluate the effects of temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation on weaning outcome and maximal inspiratory pressure.

Methods

Multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study. Patients aged ⩾18 years on invasive mechanical ventilation for ⩾4 days and having failed at least two weaning attempts received temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation using a multielectrode stimulating central venous catheter (bilateral phrenic stimulation) and standard of care (treatment) (n = 57) or standard of care (control) (n = 55). In seven patients, the catheter could not be inserted, and in seven others, pacing therapy could not be delivered; consequently, data were available for 43 patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients successfully weaned. Other endpoints were mechanical ventilation duration, 30-day survival, maximal inspiratory pressure, diaphragm-thickening fraction, adverse events, and stimulation-related pain. Measurements and Main

Results

The incidences of successful weaning were 82% (treatment) and 74% (control) (absolute difference [95% confidence interval (CI)], 7% [-10 to 25]), P = 0.59. Mechanical ventilation duration (mean ± SD) was 12.7 ± 9.9 days and 14.1 ± 10.8 days, respectively, P = 0.50; maximal inspiratory pressure increased by 16.6 cm H2O and 4.8 cm H2O, respectively (difference [95% CI], 11.8 [5 to 19]), P = 0.001; and right hemidiaphragm thickening fraction during unassisted spontaneous breathing was +17% and -14%, respectively, P = 0.006, without correlation with changes in maximal inspiratory pressure. Serious adverse event frequency was similar in both groups. Median stimulation-related pain in the treatment group was 0 (no pain).

Conclusions

Temporary transvenous diaphragm neurostimulation did not increase the proportion of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation. It was associated with a significant increase in maximal inspiratory pressure, suggesting reversal of the course of diaphragm dysfunction. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03096639) and the European Database on Medical Devices (CIV-17-06-020004).

Для цитирования: Dres Martin, de Abreu Marcelo Gama, Merdji Hamid, Müller-Redetzky Holger, Dellweg Dominic, Randerath Winfried J, Mortaza Satar, Jung Boris, Bruells Christian, Moerer Onnen, Scharffenberg Martin, Jaber Samir, Besset Sébastien, Bitter Thomas, Geise Arnim, Heine Alexander, Malfertheiner Maximilian V, Kortgen Andreas, Benzaquen Jonathan, Nelson Teresa, Uhrig Alexander, Moenig Olaf, Meziani Ferhat, Demoule Alexandre, Similowski Thomas, RESCUE-2 Study Group Investigators. Randomized Clinical Study of Temporary Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Difficult-to-Wean Patients.. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202107-1709oc.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.