Neuro-oncology practice · 2026
Intracranial meningioma as a threat and a smoldering crisis: A qualitative interview study from diagnosis to surgery to postoperative surveillance.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Budde Josephine Bjørn, Nordentoft Sara, Haslund-Vinding Jeppe Lohfert, Mathiesen Tiit, Køster Allan, Fernandez Anthony, Guldager Rikke, Maier Andrea Daniela
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intracranial meningiomas are associated with substantial psychological morbidity. We aimed to characterize patients' subjective experience of their disease trajectories.
METHODS: We conducted an exploratory interview study. Ten adults with meningioma participated in semistructured interviews 6-36 months post-diagnosis. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
RESULTS: Patients consistently framed meningioma as a recurrent threat, with 3 temporal anchors: diagnosis, surgery, and long-term postoperative surveillance. Threat encompassed identity, daily functioning, and bodily trust, with persistent uncertainty. Coping strategies included humor, social connectedness, and structured rehabilitation, whereas avoidance and internet searching often amplified distress. Clinical conversations could reframe the threat and restore a sense of safety.
CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial meningioma is commonly experienced as a persistent, multifaceted threat. Care pathways should incorporate crisis-informed communication, expectation-setting regarding prognosis and surveillance, and distress triage using validated tools to align clinical care with lived experience and help prevent a smoldering crisis in patients and families.
METHODS: We conducted an exploratory interview study. Ten adults with meningioma participated in semistructured interviews 6-36 months post-diagnosis. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
RESULTS: Patients consistently framed meningioma as a recurrent threat, with 3 temporal anchors: diagnosis, surgery, and long-term postoperative surveillance. Threat encompassed identity, daily functioning, and bodily trust, with persistent uncertainty. Coping strategies included humor, social connectedness, and structured rehabilitation, whereas avoidance and internet searching often amplified distress. Clinical conversations could reframe the threat and restore a sense of safety.
CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial meningioma is commonly experienced as a persistent, multifaceted threat. Care pathways should incorporate crisis-informed communication, expectation-setting regarding prognosis and surveillance, and distress triage using validated tools to align clinical care with lived experience and help prevent a smoldering crisis in patients and families.