MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12630-018-1139-6

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2018

Suspected periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty under propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study.

Kishimoto Miwa, Yamana Hayato, Inoue Satoki, Noda Tatsuya, Akahane Manabu, Inagaki Yusuke, Matsui Hiroki, Yasunaga Hideo, Kawaguchi Masahiko, Imamura Tomoaki

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty. Though there are many factors that might increase its risk, the use of propofol for maintaining general anesthesia could theoretically increase the incidence of infection because of its lipid component that supports bacterial growth. Nevertheless, the relationship between anesthetic maintenance agents and the occurrence of periprosthetic joint infection remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of suspected early-onset periprosthetic joint infection between patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under propofol vs sevoflurane anesthesia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in the national inpatient Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Suspected periprosthetic joint infection was surrogately defined as the need for arthrocentesis or debridement within 30 days of surgery. Propensity score matching was performed between patients who received either propofol or sevoflurane for anesthetic maintenance to determine the proportion of those with infection.

RESULTS

Eligible patients (n = 21,899) were categorized into either the propofol (n = 7,439) or sevoflurane (n = 14,460) groups. In the 5,140 propensity-matched patient pairs, there was no significant difference in the proportion of arthrocentesis or debridement [1.3% propofol vs 1.7% sevoflurane; respectively (relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.04; P = 0.10)] between the groups. The mean (SD) length of stay in the propofol group was significantly longer than in the sevoflurane group [32.5 (18.4) days vs 31.4 (14.4) days, respectively; mean difference, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.8; P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Propensity score analysis suggested no significant association between the choice of anesthetic maintenance agent and the occurrence of suspected early-onset periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Для цитирования: Kishimoto Miwa, Yamana Hayato, Inoue Satoki, Noda Tatsuya, Akahane Manabu, Inagaki Yusuke, Matsui Hiroki, Yasunaga Hideo, Kawaguchi Masahiko, Imamura Tomoaki. Suspected periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty under propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study.. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-018-1139-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.