Outcomes of patients at estimated low surgical risk undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with balloon-expandable prostheses.

INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES

Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) is an accepted treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk. However, there is lack in data about TAVI in low-risk patients that are already being treated with this therapy in some clinical contexts.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients treated with transfemoral TAVI using Edwards Sapien prosthesis in one center was performed, classifying the patients into three groups according to the surgical risk (high/intermediate/low risk for STS score>8/4-8/<4). Clinical characteristics, procedure and follow-up outcomes were collected, comparing the results between low and high surgical risk groups.

RESULTS

89 TAVIs using Edwards balloon expandable prosthesis were performed (9 Sapien XT and 80 Sapien 3 valves were implanted). 40 patients (45%) presented a STS score<4, while 33 (37%) had a STS>8. Low-risk patients were significantly younger and had lower rates of coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary lung disease and atrial fibrillation. There were no significant differences in most of the technical variables of the procedure, apart from vascular complications and complete left bundle branch block after valve implant, which were higher in the group with STS>8. Patients of low risk presented shorter hospital stay (2,91±1,6, vs 4,8±3,9 days), with lower rates of mortality at mid- and long follow-up (death from any cause 15,2% vs 0%, p 0,04).

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI in low-risk patients is safe and associated with better outcome at mid and long-term follow-up compared to high-risk patients.