MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.25192

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2018

Salvage laryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy: Multicenter review of outcomes associated with a reconstructive approach.

Microvascular Committee of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery*

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Surgeons have developed various reconstructive techniques to minimize the rate of pharyngocutaneous fistula and optimize functional outcome after salvage laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective review at 33 institutions of 486 patients with a history of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the larynx or hypopharynx previously treated with primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT) who required salvage surgery. Outcomes evaluated were overall fistula rate, fistula requiring reoperation, and 12-month speech and swallowing function.

RESULTS

Primary closure of the hypopharynx was associated with a statistically higher overall fistula rate and fistula requiring reoperation compared to reconstruction with vascularized tissue augmentation. Vascularized tissue augmentation with muscle led to worse 12-month "understandability of speech" and "nutritional mode" scores compared to vascularized tissue augmentation without muscle.

CONCLUSION

Vascularized tissue augmentation reduces the overall fistula rate and fistula requiring reoperation but vascularized tissue augmentation with muscle may impair speech and swallowing outcomes.

Для цитирования: Microvascular Committee of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery*. Salvage laryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy: Multicenter review of outcomes associated with a reconstructive approach.. Head & neck. 2018. DOI: 10.1002/hed.25192.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.