MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of psychiatry. Supplement · 2001

Long-term clinical effectiveness of lithium maintenance treatment in types I and II bipolar disorders.

Tondo L, Baldessarini R J, Floris G

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of lithium is being questioned increasingly and requires clarification.

AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of lithium treatment in depression and mania, syndromal types I and II, with predominantly mixed or psychotic episodes or rapid cycling, during treatment resumed following discontinuation, and across three decades.

METHOD: The longitudinal course of 360 patients with bipolar disorder compliant with lithium treatment for at least 1 year and without comorbidity for substance use disorder was reviewed.

RESULTS

Risk of single-episode recurrences, a common index of treatment failure, was similar to that in other reports. Both episode frequency and 'time ill' improved more in type II than type I cases. Reduced morbidity during treatment was similar in patients with mixed or psychotic episodes, or rapid cycling, and in less complex cases. Retreatment yielded minor decrements in response, and there was no tendency for lesser responses in more recent years.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on overall affective morbidity, long-term lithium treatment in compliant patients without comorbid substance use disorder, though imperfect, remains effective, even in subgroups of supposedly poor prognosis.

Для цитирования: Tondo L, Baldessarini R J, Floris G. Long-term clinical effectiveness of lithium maintenance treatment in types I and II bipolar disorders.. The British journal of psychiatry. Supplement. 2001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.