MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072736

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2023

Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Lin Jin-Wei, Chen Chung-Ting, Hsieh Ming-Shun, Lee I-Hsin, Yen David Hung-Tsang, Cheng Hao-Min, Hsu Teh-Fu

Систематический обзорМетаанализСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) against percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) for liver abscess.

DESIGN

Systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Airiti Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception up to 16 March 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared PCD to PNA for liver abscess were considered eligible, without restriction on language.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Primary outcome was treatment success rate. Depending on heterogeneity, either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was used to derive overall estimates. Review Manager V.5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis was performed using the Trial Sequential Analysis software. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

Ten trials totalling 1287 individuals were included. Pooled analysis revealed that PCD, when compared with PNA, enhanced treatment success rate (risk ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.25). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated this robust finding with required information size attained. For large abscesses, subgroup analysis favoured PCD (test of subgroup difference, p<0.001). In comparison to PNA, pooled analysis indicated a significant benefit of PCD on time to achieve clinical improvement or complete clinical relief (mean differences (MD) -2.53 days; 95% CI -3.54 to -1.52) in six studies with 1000 patients; time to achieve a 50% reduction in abscess size (MD -2.49 days; 95% CI -3.59 to -1.38) in five studies with 772 patients; and duration of intravenous antibiotic use (MD -4.04 days, 95% CI -5.99 to -2.10) in four studies with 763 patients. In-hospital mortality and complications were not different.

CONCLUSION

In patients with liver abscess, ultrasound-guided PCD raises the treatment success rate by 136 in 1000 patients, improves clinical outcomes by 3 days and reduces the need for intravenous antibiotics by 4 days.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022316540.

Для цитирования: Lin Jin-Wei, Chen Chung-Ting, Hsieh Ming-Shun, Lee I-Hsin, Yen David Hung-Tsang, Cheng Hao-Min, Hsu Teh-Fu. Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.. BMJ open. 2023. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072736.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.