Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2013
Self-retaining bicanaliculus stents as an adjunct to 3-snip punctoplasty in management of upper lacrimal duct stenosis: a comparison to standard 3-snip procedure.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chalvatzis Nikolaos T, Tzamalis Argyrios K, Mavrikakis Ioannis, Tsinopoulos Ioannis, Dimitrakos Stavros
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of self-retaining bicanaliculus stents when used as an adjunct to 3-snip punctoplasty in comparison with standard 3-snip procedure between fellow eyes.
METHODS: Prospective, randomized, comparative study. Thirty-two eyes of 16 consecutive patients with acquired, nontraumatic stenosis of the proximal lacrimal duct were randomly distributed into 2 equal study groups. Lower punctal stenosis was a standard prerequisite. Group A (16 eyes) received a simple 3-snip punctoplasty, while group B (16 fellow eyes) underwent a modified 3-snip punctoplasty combined with insertion of self-retaining bicanaliculus stents. Duration of follow ups: 6 months. Anatomical, functional, and subjective parameters were evaluated.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in anatomical success rates was observed in favor of group B (p = 0.011) 6 months postoperatively. Complete relief from epiphora was noted in 8 eyes of group B compared with 2 eyes of group A (p = 0.057). In regard to mixed (absolute and partial) functional success rates, group B exceeded with statistically significant difference (15 eyes group B vs. 6 eyes group A; p = 0.002). A nasolacrimal duct obstruction was subsequently diagnosed in 3 of the nonpatient eyes. Reintroduction of silicone tubes was required in 4 eyes of group B.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of self-retaining bicanaliculus stents seems to improve anatomical, functional, and subjective scores when combined with standard 3-snip punctoplasty in patients with acquired upper lacrimal duct stenosis.
METHODS: Prospective, randomized, comparative study. Thirty-two eyes of 16 consecutive patients with acquired, nontraumatic stenosis of the proximal lacrimal duct were randomly distributed into 2 equal study groups. Lower punctal stenosis was a standard prerequisite. Group A (16 eyes) received a simple 3-snip punctoplasty, while group B (16 fellow eyes) underwent a modified 3-snip punctoplasty combined with insertion of self-retaining bicanaliculus stents. Duration of follow ups: 6 months. Anatomical, functional, and subjective parameters were evaluated.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in anatomical success rates was observed in favor of group B (p = 0.011) 6 months postoperatively. Complete relief from epiphora was noted in 8 eyes of group B compared with 2 eyes of group A (p = 0.057). In regard to mixed (absolute and partial) functional success rates, group B exceeded with statistically significant difference (15 eyes group B vs. 6 eyes group A; p = 0.002). A nasolacrimal duct obstruction was subsequently diagnosed in 3 of the nonpatient eyes. Reintroduction of silicone tubes was required in 4 eyes of group B.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of self-retaining bicanaliculus stents seems to improve anatomical, functional, and subjective scores when combined with standard 3-snip punctoplasty in patients with acquired upper lacrimal duct stenosis.