American journal of ophthalmology · 1995
Viral sensitivity testing in patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis clinically resistant to foscarnet or ganciclovir.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dunn J P, MacCumber M W, Forman M S, Charache P, Apuzzo L, Jabs D A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Resistance to antiviral therapy is a potential cause of progression of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. We investigated the results of viral sensitivity testing in a series of patients with clinically resistant retinitis who had positive results of blood or urine cytomegalovirus cultures.
METHODS: All patients with newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus retinitis between January 1990 and December 1991 were prospectively studied. Blood and urine cultures for cytomegalovirus were obtained in a nonrandomized subgroup of this group. The results of in vitro sensitivity to foscarnet and ganciclovir, determined by a DNA hybridization assay, were then analyzed in seven patients with clinically resistant cytomegalovirus retinitis and whose blood or urine culture results, or both, were positive for cytomegalovirus while on a treatment regimen.
RESULTS: Foscarnet-resistant cytomegalovirus (ID50 > 300 microM) was isolated from two patients, one of whom was being treated with foscarnet. Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (ID 50 > 6.0 microM) was isolated from four patients, three of whom were being treated with ganciclovir. Foscarnet- and ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus occurred with previous ganciclovir therapy in one patient. Clinical improvement occurred in three patients whose change in therapy was based on viral sensitivity testing. In general, prolonged therapy with one drug was associated with a progressive increase in the ID 50 for that drug.
CONCLUSIONS: Viral resistance to foscarnet or ganciclovir may explain refractory cytomegalovirus retinitis in some patients.
METHODS: All patients with newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus retinitis between January 1990 and December 1991 were prospectively studied. Blood and urine cultures for cytomegalovirus were obtained in a nonrandomized subgroup of this group. The results of in vitro sensitivity to foscarnet and ganciclovir, determined by a DNA hybridization assay, were then analyzed in seven patients with clinically resistant cytomegalovirus retinitis and whose blood or urine culture results, or both, were positive for cytomegalovirus while on a treatment regimen.
RESULTS: Foscarnet-resistant cytomegalovirus (ID50 > 300 microM) was isolated from two patients, one of whom was being treated with foscarnet. Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (ID 50 > 6.0 microM) was isolated from four patients, three of whom were being treated with ganciclovir. Foscarnet- and ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus occurred with previous ganciclovir therapy in one patient. Clinical improvement occurred in three patients whose change in therapy was based on viral sensitivity testing. In general, prolonged therapy with one drug was associated with a progressive increase in the ID 50 for that drug.
CONCLUSIONS: Viral resistance to foscarnet or ganciclovir may explain refractory cytomegalovirus retinitis in some patients.