MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.nmd.2025.106208

Медицинская библиотека · Neuromuscular disorders : NMD · 2025

Consensus recommendations and considerations for the delivery and monitoring of gene therapy in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Wolff Jodi M, Capocci Nora, Atas Evrim, Bharucha-Goebel Diana X, Brandsema John F, Butterfield Russell J, Chadwick Christina B, Corti Manuela, Crawford Thomas O, Cripe Linda, Day John W, Duong Tina, ElMallah Mai K, Flanigan Kevin M, George Lindsey A, Goedeker Natalie L, Goude Erica, Hesterlee Sharon, Lin Brian, Katz Natalie K, Matesanz Susan E, McDonald Craig, McNally Elizabeth M, Mercado-Rodriguez Claudia, Nandi Deipanjan, Parsons Julie A, Proud Crystal, Ramos-Platt Leigh, Lek Angela, Salabarria Stephanie M, Camino Eric, Schrader Rachel, Shea Erin, Shell Richard, Shieh Perry B, Soslow Jonathan H, Taylor Jane B, Veerapandiyan Aravindhan, Villa Chet, Yang Michele L, Zaidman Craig M, Leon-Astudillo Carmen, Byrne Barry J

СтатьяОбзорConsensus StatementПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Gene transfer therapy represents a major advancement in the treatment of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). As clinical use expands, there is an urgent need for standardized, evidence and practice-informed guidelines to ensure safe and equitable delivery of this and similar products. A group of clinicians and researchers, coordinated by the Muscular Dystrophy Association and Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, developed these consensus guidelines to outline recommendations for patient selection, institutional readiness, monitoring, and adverse event management, particularly in the first three months after treatment. This document emphasizes the importance of experienced multidisciplinary teams, real-time safety surveillance, and transparent reporting to support patient safety and clinician decision-making after treatment. While the Food and Drug Administration has approved only one gene therapy product for the treatment of patients with DMD, these recommendations may potentially apply to other products in clinical development. Currently, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding long-term safety, durability, and optimal timing of dosing, particularly for patients with advanced disease. Researchers do not fully understand how combination therapies and genetic background may impact the response to gene therapy. To address these gaps, ongoing real-world data collection, cross-center collaboration, and flexible adaptation of clinical protocols are essential. While these guidelines are based primarily on clinical expertise rather than well-established evidence, the guideline provides a foundation to support administration of gene therapy for patients with DMD. As the field evolves, continued refinement will be essential to maximize benefit, reduce risk, and inform future standards of care.

Для цитирования: Wolff Jodi M, Capocci Nora, Atas Evrim, Bharucha-Goebel Diana X, Brandsema John F, Butterfield Russell J, Chadwick Christina B, Corti Manuela, Crawford Thomas O, Cripe Linda, Day John W, Duong Tina, ElMallah Mai K, Flanigan Kevin M, George Lindsey A, Goedeker Natalie L, Goude Erica, Hesterlee Sharon, Lin Brian, Katz Natalie K, Matesanz Susan E, McDonald Craig, McNally Elizabeth M, Mercado-Rodriguez Claudia, Nandi Deipanjan, Parsons Julie A, Proud Crystal, Ramos-Platt Leigh, Lek Angela, Salabarria Stephanie M, Camino Eric, Schrader Rachel, Shea Erin, Shell Richard, Shieh Perry B, Soslow Jonathan H, Taylor Jane B, Veerapandiyan Aravindhan, Villa Chet, Yang Michele L, Zaidman Craig M, Leon-Astudillo Carmen, Byrne Barry J. Consensus recommendations and considerations for the delivery and monitoring of gene therapy in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.. Neuromuscular disorders : NMD. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2025.106208.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.