Randomized clinical trial comparing customized corneal crosslinking: epi-on in high oxygen and epi-off in room air for keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes of customized transepithelial (epi-on) corneal crosslinking (CXL) in high oxygen and customized CXL with epithelial removal (epi-off) in room air for keratoconus (KC).

SETTING

Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, single-masked, intraindividually comparing study.

METHODS

32 participants with bilateral progressive KC were treated with bilateral customized topography-guided CXL, 30 mW/cm 2 ; 7.2 to 15 J/cm 2 and were randomized to epi-on in one eye (32 eyes) and epi-off in the fellow eye (32 eyes). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), maximal keratometry (Kmax), subjective ocular discomfort, low-contrast visual acuities (LCVAs) at 10% and 2.5% contrast, ocular and anterior corneal wavefront aberrations, manifest refractive spherical equivalent, endothelial cell count (ECC), and adverse events were assessed through 24 months.

RESULTS

Both treatments showed improvements at 24 months in UDVA; -0.16 ± 0.24 ( P < .001) and -0.13 ± 0.20 logMAR ( P = .006), respectively, CDVA; -0.10 ± 0.11 ( P < .001) and -0.10 ± 0.12 ( P = .001), Kmax; -1.74 ± 1.31 ( P < .001) and -1.72 ± 1.36 D ( P < .001). LCVA 10% improved for both protocols ( P < .001), but LCVA 2.5% improved for epi-on CXL only ( P = .001). ECC was unaltered, and no adverse events occurred. The epi-on eyes had significantly less discomfort symptoms during the whole first week posttreatment ( P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

High-oxygen customized epi-on CXL is a viable alternative to room air customized epi-off CXL, with faster improvements in CDVA and LCVA and less early ocular discomfort.