MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000003467

Медицинская библиотека · Cornea · 2024

Deep Learning Models Used in the Diagnostic Workup of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis.

Bodmer Nicolas S, Christensen Dylan G, Bachmann Lucas M, Faes Livia, Sanak Frantisek, Iselin Katja, Kaufmann Claude, Thiel Michael A, Baenninger Philipp B

Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The prevalence of keratoconus in the general population is reported to be up to 1 of 84. Over the past 2 decades, diagnosis and management evolved rapidly, but keratoconus screening in clinical practice is still challenging and asks for improving the accuracy of keratoconus detection. Deep learning (DL) offers considerable promise for improving the accuracy and speed of medical imaging interpretation. We establish an inventory of studies conducted with DL algorithms that have attempted to diagnose keratoconus.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. We searched (Pre-)MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, Conference Proceedings Citation Index, arXiv document server, and Google Scholar from inception to February 18, 2022. We included studies that evaluated the performance of DL algorithms in the diagnosis of keratoconus. The main outcome was diagnostic performance measured as sensitivity and specificity, and the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2.

RESULTS

Searches retrieved 4100 nonduplicate records, and we included 19 studies in the qualitative synthesis and 10 studies in the exploratory meta-analysis. The overall study quality was limited because of poor reporting of patient selection and the use of inadequate reference standards. We found a pooled sensitivity of 97.5% (95% confidence interval, 93.6%-99.0%) and a pooled specificity of 97.2% (95% confidence interval, 85.7%-99.5%) for topography images as input.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review found that the overall diagnostic performance of DL models to detect keratoconus was good, but the methodological quality of included studies was modest.

Для цитирования: Bodmer Nicolas S, Christensen Dylan G, Bachmann Lucas M, Faes Livia, Sanak Frantisek, Iselin Katja, Kaufmann Claude, Thiel Michael A, Baenninger Philipp B. Deep Learning Models Used in the Diagnostic Workup of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis.. Cornea. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000003467.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.