MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of current ophthalmology · 2023
Evaluation of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Keratoconus Patients: Does Choroidal Vascularity Change in Keratoconus?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hashemian Mohammad Naser, Ghafarian Sadegh, Riazi-Esfahani Hamid, Khalili Pour Elias
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the choroidal structure in keratoconic patients with different severity using the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) derived from image binarization on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography scans (EDI-OCT).
METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes from 34 keratoconus (KCN) patients and 72 eyes from 36 healthy subjects were recruited in this prospective, noninterventional, comparative cross-sectional study. EDI-OCT was employed to measure choroidal parameters, including choroidal thickness (CT), total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area, stromal area, and CVI.
RESULTS: Subfoveal CT was 354.6 ± 66.8 μm in the control group and 371 ± 64.5 μm in the KCN group (P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between control and KCN groups in terms of TCA (0.66 ± 0.14 mm2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.12 mm2; P = 0.70), luminal area (0.49 ± 0.10 mm2 vs. 0.53 ± 0.08 mm2; P = 0.67), and stromal area (0.16 ± 0.05 mm2 vs. 0.17 ± 0.05 mm2; P = 0.84). CVI was also comparable in the control group (75.4% ±3.4%) and the KCN group (75.6% ±4.5%; P = 0.43). There was also no significant correlation between other choroidal parameters and KCN severity indices.
CONCLUSION: It seems that CVI as well as other choroidal biomarkers were not significantly different between patients with KCN and healthy subjects.
METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes from 34 keratoconus (KCN) patients and 72 eyes from 36 healthy subjects were recruited in this prospective, noninterventional, comparative cross-sectional study. EDI-OCT was employed to measure choroidal parameters, including choroidal thickness (CT), total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area, stromal area, and CVI.
RESULTS: Subfoveal CT was 354.6 ± 66.8 μm in the control group and 371 ± 64.5 μm in the KCN group (P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between control and KCN groups in terms of TCA (0.66 ± 0.14 mm2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.12 mm2; P = 0.70), luminal area (0.49 ± 0.10 mm2 vs. 0.53 ± 0.08 mm2; P = 0.67), and stromal area (0.16 ± 0.05 mm2 vs. 0.17 ± 0.05 mm2; P = 0.84). CVI was also comparable in the control group (75.4% ±3.4%) and the KCN group (75.6% ±4.5%; P = 0.43). There was also no significant correlation between other choroidal parameters and KCN severity indices.
CONCLUSION: It seems that CVI as well as other choroidal biomarkers were not significantly different between patients with KCN and healthy subjects.