Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025
REPRIEVE final results: What does it mean for guidelines in low- and middle-income countries?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sokhela Simiso, Manne-Goehler Jennifer M, Lalla-Edward Samanta, Siedner Mark J, Ali Mohammed K, Hill Andrew, Mody Aaloke, Pozniak Anton, Nel Jeremy, Venter W D Francois
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The REPRIEVE study demonstrated significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with pitavastatin among people living with HIV (PWH) with low to moderate cardiovascular risk. Most MACE events occurred in higher-income countries, raising important considerations for similar primary prevention interventions within HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) as antiretrovirals become safer and as PWH age.
DISCUSSION: Limited data from Africa and within REPRIEVE suggests that MACE may not be as prevalent among PWH as within other geographies. Consequently, there remain questions about the appropriateness of extrapolating REPRIEVE data to the region and whether it should motivate programmatic implementation on the continent. Moreover, glucose and lipid screening used in REPRIEVE raise concerns about additional resources for similar screening, where there is little existing infrastructure and subsequent treatment. Similarly, questions around funding priorities, and health worker resource allocation for MACE prevention, particularly in the context of competing health priorities and limited health financing, need to be addressed. Newer cardiovascular medications, with cardiac, renal, hepatic, diabetes and weight loss benefits, may have greater promise, although cost remains a major concern. Finally, successful implementation with statins or other proven interventions will be unlikely, unless systemic change within non-communicable disease health system delivery programmes occurs first. However, HIV programmes and public health systems more generally have shown themselves to be poor at screening and treating other cardiovascular risk factors, including aspects as simple as raised blood pressure, even in high-income countries, and statins remain grossly under-prescribed for primary and secondary prevention internationally.
CONCLUSIONS: REPRIEVE turned a spotlight on how ill-prepared current HIV programmes are to implement the simplest and safest primary care prevention interventions for cardiometabolic disease within LMICs. As data for existing and new interventions become available, HIV delivery systems will need to raise their standard beyond simply prescribing antiretrovirals and taking viral loads.
DISCUSSION: Limited data from Africa and within REPRIEVE suggests that MACE may not be as prevalent among PWH as within other geographies. Consequently, there remain questions about the appropriateness of extrapolating REPRIEVE data to the region and whether it should motivate programmatic implementation on the continent. Moreover, glucose and lipid screening used in REPRIEVE raise concerns about additional resources for similar screening, where there is little existing infrastructure and subsequent treatment. Similarly, questions around funding priorities, and health worker resource allocation for MACE prevention, particularly in the context of competing health priorities and limited health financing, need to be addressed. Newer cardiovascular medications, with cardiac, renal, hepatic, diabetes and weight loss benefits, may have greater promise, although cost remains a major concern. Finally, successful implementation with statins or other proven interventions will be unlikely, unless systemic change within non-communicable disease health system delivery programmes occurs first. However, HIV programmes and public health systems more generally have shown themselves to be poor at screening and treating other cardiovascular risk factors, including aspects as simple as raised blood pressure, even in high-income countries, and statins remain grossly under-prescribed for primary and secondary prevention internationally.
CONCLUSIONS: REPRIEVE turned a spotlight on how ill-prepared current HIV programmes are to implement the simplest and safest primary care prevention interventions for cardiometabolic disease within LMICs. As data for existing and new interventions become available, HIV delivery systems will need to raise their standard beyond simply prescribing antiretrovirals and taking viral loads.