The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc · 1997
A double-masked, placebo-controlled evaluation of the efficacy and safety of loteprednol etabonate in the treatment of giant papillary conjunctivitis.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Asbell P, Howes J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% ophthalmic suspension (LE) for reducing the ocular signs and symptoms accompanying contact lens associated giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC). We conducted a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel study at 11 U.S. academic or private practice clinics.
METHODS: Two hundred and twenty adults with contact lens associated GPC were enrolled in this study. Patient were treated with either LE or the loteprednol etabonate vehicle (placebo), q.i.d. for 6 weeks. Papillae, itching, lens intolerance, as well as other signs and symptoms of GPC (0 to 3 or 0 to 4 point severity scales), and intraocular pressure were measured.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients treated with LE demonstrating an improvement in papillae of at least one grade (75%) was significantly greater than the proportion of those treated with placebo (50%, P < 0.001). A treatment difference favoring LE was also seen with improvement in itching (92% vs. 76%, P = 0.001) and lens intolerance (84% vs. 66%, P = 0.002). Three patients (all on LE) had an intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation of 10 mm Hg or higher from baseline on at least one on-treatment visit. Cessation of therapy was required in one of these patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were well tolerated and no serious, unexpected, treatment-related medical events were reported. The rapid therapeutic response, combined with the low incidence, late development, and transient nature of any IOP elevation suggests that LE may be helpful in treating GPC.
METHODS: Two hundred and twenty adults with contact lens associated GPC were enrolled in this study. Patient were treated with either LE or the loteprednol etabonate vehicle (placebo), q.i.d. for 6 weeks. Papillae, itching, lens intolerance, as well as other signs and symptoms of GPC (0 to 3 or 0 to 4 point severity scales), and intraocular pressure were measured.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients treated with LE demonstrating an improvement in papillae of at least one grade (75%) was significantly greater than the proportion of those treated with placebo (50%, P < 0.001). A treatment difference favoring LE was also seen with improvement in itching (92% vs. 76%, P = 0.001) and lens intolerance (84% vs. 66%, P = 0.002). Three patients (all on LE) had an intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation of 10 mm Hg or higher from baseline on at least one on-treatment visit. Cessation of therapy was required in one of these patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were well tolerated and no serious, unexpected, treatment-related medical events were reported. The rapid therapeutic response, combined with the low incidence, late development, and transient nature of any IOP elevation suggests that LE may be helpful in treating GPC.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Administration, TopicalAdolescentAdultAgedAndrostadienesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsConjunctivitis, AllergicContact LensesDouble-Blind MethodDrug EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraocular PressureLoteprednol EtabonateMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsProspective StudiesSafetySuspensionsTreatment Outcome