MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105511

Медицинская библиотека · Neurobiology of disease · 2021

Second hit hypothesis in dystonia: Dysfunctional cross talk between neuroplasticity and environment?

Rauschenberger Lisa, Knorr Susanne, Pisani Antonio, Hallett Mark, Volkmann Jens, Ip Chi Wang

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

One of the great mysteries in dystonia pathophysiology is the role of environmental factors in disease onset and development. Progress has been made in defining the genetic components of dystonic syndromes, still the mechanisms behind the discrepant relationship between dystonic genotype and phenotype remain largely unclear. Within this review, the preclinical and clinical evidence for environmental stressors as disease modifiers in dystonia pathogenesis are summarized and critically evaluated. The potential role of extragenetic factors is discussed in monogenic as well as adult-onset isolated dystonia. The available clinical evidence for a "second hit" is analyzed in light of the reduced penetrance of monogenic dystonic syndromes and put into context with evidence from animal and cellular models. The contradictory studies on adult-onset dystonia are discussed in detail and backed up by evidence from animal models. Taken together, there is clear evidence of a gene-environment interaction in dystonia, which should be considered in the continued quest to unravel dystonia pathophysiology.

Для цитирования: Rauschenberger Lisa, Knorr Susanne, Pisani Antonio, Hallett Mark, Volkmann Jens, Ip Chi Wang. Second hit hypothesis in dystonia: Dysfunctional cross talk between neuroplasticity and environment?. Neurobiology of disease. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105511.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.