Injury · 2019
Identification of the lateral femoral safe zone for drilling during LISS plate fixation of distal femur fractures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Asadollahi Saeed, Holcdorf David, Stella Damien L, Bucknill Andrew
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The incidence of arterial injury associated with femoral fractures is approximately 1%. Lateral sub-muscular plate fixation is gaining popularity for the management of distal femoral fractures. The objective of this study was to assess the iatrogenic risk to the superficial femoral artery (SFA) during Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS) plate fixation of distal femoral fractures by analysing the range of distances and angles between LISS plate screws and the drilling line to the SFA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent LISS plate fixation of distal femoral fractures between 2008 and 2018 in our level-1 trauma centre. Patients who underwent postoperative computed tomography for any reason were eligible for inclusion in the study. Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. The sample comprised 10 male and 15 female patients with a mean age of 55 years. The most common fracture type was a supracondylar femur fracture (56%), followed by an intercondylar fracture (36%). A 13-hole LISS plate was the most common plate length used (44%). A consultant radiologist reviewed all scans to verify the visibility and marking of the SFA.
RESULTS: The median distance between the screw tip and the SFA was 21 mm (range, 8-65 mm). There was a negative correlation between the LISS plate hole number and the trajectory of drilling (Pearson coefficient: -0.87, p < 0.001). Using a linear regression model, the SFA was more likely to be in the line of drilling when the 6th to 10th holes in the LISS plate were used.
CONCLUSION: Extra care is needed when drilling into the LISS plate holes from the lateral to the medial direction in order to reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury to the SFA, especially in the high-risk plate zone where the artery can be close to the drilling line.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent LISS plate fixation of distal femoral fractures between 2008 and 2018 in our level-1 trauma centre. Patients who underwent postoperative computed tomography for any reason were eligible for inclusion in the study. Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. The sample comprised 10 male and 15 female patients with a mean age of 55 years. The most common fracture type was a supracondylar femur fracture (56%), followed by an intercondylar fracture (36%). A 13-hole LISS plate was the most common plate length used (44%). A consultant radiologist reviewed all scans to verify the visibility and marking of the SFA.
RESULTS: The median distance between the screw tip and the SFA was 21 mm (range, 8-65 mm). There was a negative correlation between the LISS plate hole number and the trajectory of drilling (Pearson coefficient: -0.87, p < 0.001). Using a linear regression model, the SFA was more likely to be in the line of drilling when the 6th to 10th holes in the LISS plate were used.
CONCLUSION: Extra care is needed when drilling into the LISS plate holes from the lateral to the medial direction in order to reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury to the SFA, especially in the high-risk plate zone where the artery can be close to the drilling line.