MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1258/095646202760029741

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of STD & AIDS · 2002

Vulvovaginal candidiasis: a comparison of HIV-positive and -negative women.

Sobel Jack D

Сравнительное исследованиеРедакционная статьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Although considerable information has accumulated in the last decade regarding rates of both vaginal colonization and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) in HIV-positive women, gaps in our knowledge remain, particularly with regard to pathophysiology of clinical disease. Unfortunately, early and possibly premature conclusions were reached in the late 1980s which resulted in the widespread dissemination of information indicating that recurrent VVC (RVVC) was a manifestation of HIV infection and that women with RVVC should be tested for HIV. Unfortunately, subsequent data from cohort studies involving HIV-positive women failed to determine attack rates of symptomatic Candida vaginitis requiring therapy. Recent studies indicate that Candida vaginitis, even if more frequent in HIV infected women, is clinically similar to that experienced in HIV-negative women and does not appear to be of increased clinical severity. VVC in HIV-positive women can be treated by conventional methods including the use of maintenance suppressive antifungal therapy and most importantly RVVC in women is not in itself a sentinel of HIV infection. Ongoing concerns include vaginal acquisition of non-albicans Candida species and the development of antimycotic drug resistance in C. albicans vaginal isolates.

Для цитирования: Sobel Jack D. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: a comparison of HIV-positive and -negative women.. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2002. DOI: 10.1258/095646202760029741.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.