MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116025

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2023

Comparative performance of microbiological methods for the detection of tuberculous meningitis pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid.

Lin Yuling, Zhang Weili, Xiong Ying, Wang Yue, Yu Qiuju, Ma Ying, Xie Yi

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), Acid-fast bacillus stain (AFB), MGIT960 culture, polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR), and Xpert MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). A cohort of 280 patients who presented with suspected TBM (ie, headache or altered mental status with clinical signs of meningism) were analyzed. The sensitivities of the 5 assays for the diagnosis of TBM ranged from 10.0% to 70.0%. The AFB had the lowest sensitivity of 10.0% (0.5-45.9), while mNGS and PCR had the highest sensitivity, both at 70.0% (35.4-91.9). mNGS demonstrated a distinct advantage in identifying a wider array of pathogens, including viruses, in CSF samples. PCR was a cost-effective option with excellent sensitivity and specificity. However, no single method was statistically significantly better than any other in the diagnosis of TBM. New diagnostic techniques are urgently needed for the independent, rapid and accurate detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to guide the diagnosis of TBM.

Для цитирования: Lin Yuling, Zhang Weili, Xiong Ying, Wang Yue, Yu Qiuju, Ma Ying, Xie Yi. Comparative performance of microbiological methods for the detection of tuberculous meningitis pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid.. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.