Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2016
Electrical Remodeling of the Atrioventricular Node Caused by Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Humans.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sairaku Akinori, Nakano Yukiko, Suenari Kazuyoshi, Tokuyama Takehito, Kawazoe Hiroshi, Matsumura Hiroya, Tomomori Shunsuke, Amioka Michitaka, Kihara Yasuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An animal experiment showed that long-term atrial pacing or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) caused electrical remodeling of the atrioventricular (AV) node. We aimed to test the hypothesis that persistent AF decreases the AV conductivity in human hearts.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively compared the cardiac electrophysiological properties between patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent catheter ablation (PXAF, N = 254) and those with persistent or longstanding persistent AF (PSAF, N = 213). The PSAF patients were more likely than PXAF patients to have longer atrial-His (AH) (96.3 ± 25.7 vs. 91.3 ± 20.4 milliseconds; P = 0.02) and His-ventricle (HV) (43.1 ± 9.4 vs. 41.2 ± 8.6 milliseconds; P = 0.02) intervals. The AV nodal effective refractory period (ERP) (299.1 ± 74.6 vs. 276.2 ± 58.9 milliseconds; P < 0.001) and Wenckebach cycle length (420.9 ± 80.3 vs. 386 ± 58.6 milliseconds; P < 0.001) were also more prolonged in the PSAF patients. We found a dual AV nodal physiology with a similar frequency in both groups. The AH interval, fast pathway ERP, and Wenckebach cycle length in the PSAF patients were more likely than in the PXAF patients to be prolonged among the patients without dual pathways, while those intergroup differences were never seen among the patients with dual pathways. In subgroup analyses including only PSAF patients, there was no difference in the AV conductivity between the patients with persistent AF and those with longstanding persistent AF.
CONCLUSIONS: Persistent AF may cause a mild decrease in the AV nodal function in human hearts. Electrical remodeling may be uncommon if dual AV nodal pathways are present, and its extent may not depend on the duration of persistent AF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively compared the cardiac electrophysiological properties between patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent catheter ablation (PXAF, N = 254) and those with persistent or longstanding persistent AF (PSAF, N = 213). The PSAF patients were more likely than PXAF patients to have longer atrial-His (AH) (96.3 ± 25.7 vs. 91.3 ± 20.4 milliseconds; P = 0.02) and His-ventricle (HV) (43.1 ± 9.4 vs. 41.2 ± 8.6 milliseconds; P = 0.02) intervals. The AV nodal effective refractory period (ERP) (299.1 ± 74.6 vs. 276.2 ± 58.9 milliseconds; P < 0.001) and Wenckebach cycle length (420.9 ± 80.3 vs. 386 ± 58.6 milliseconds; P < 0.001) were also more prolonged in the PSAF patients. We found a dual AV nodal physiology with a similar frequency in both groups. The AH interval, fast pathway ERP, and Wenckebach cycle length in the PSAF patients were more likely than in the PXAF patients to be prolonged among the patients without dual pathways, while those intergroup differences were never seen among the patients with dual pathways. In subgroup analyses including only PSAF patients, there was no difference in the AV conductivity between the patients with persistent AF and those with longstanding persistent AF.
CONCLUSIONS: Persistent AF may cause a mild decrease in the AV nodal function in human hearts. Electrical remodeling may be uncommon if dual AV nodal pathways are present, and its extent may not depend on the duration of persistent AF.