MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jclp.23404

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical psychology · 2022

Validation of the Italian version of the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire (HQ-25-I).

Fino Emanuele, Iliceto Paolo, Carcione Antonino, Giovani Eleni, Candilera Gabriella

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed to adapt the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire to the Italian context (HQ-25-I) and to test its psychometric properties in two samples, particularly a sample of residents with psychiatric conditions (n = 117) and a sample of individuals from the community (n = 209).

METHODS

We tested the fit of the original three-factor structure (Socialization, Isolation, and Emotional Support) and measurement invariance across the two groups, and the reliability, convergent, and criterion (concurrent) validity of the HQ-25-I.

RESULTS

The results showed that the original measurement model fitted the data well and that it was invariant across the two groups. The measure was reliable and positively correlated with some maladaptive personality trait domains (PID-5-BF), Depression (BDI-II), and Hopelessness (BHS) in both groups, with higher scores observed in the clinical sample. However, low correlations were found between the HQ-25-I and the PID-5-BF Detachment and Negative Affectivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the study showed that the HQ-25-I is reliable, but further examination of its validity is warranted. Implications for theory and future research are discussed.

Для цитирования: Fino Emanuele, Iliceto Paolo, Carcione Antonino, Giovani Eleni, Candilera Gabriella. Validation of the Italian version of the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire (HQ-25-I).. Journal of clinical psychology. 2022. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23404.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.