MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.3.590

Медицинская библиотека · Yonsei medical journal · 2013

Usefulness of an implantable loop recorder in patients with syncope of an unknown cause.

Kang Gu Hyun, Oh Ju Hyeon, Chun Woo Jung, Park Yong Hwan, Song Bong Gun, Kim June Soo, On Young Keun, Park Seung Jung, Huh June

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The mechanisms underlying syncope remain unknown in about 20% of patients with recurrent syncope. The implantable loop recorder (ILR) has been shown to be a useful diagnostic tool in patients with unexplained syncope even after negative initial evaluations. Nevertheless, ILR has rarely been used in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This study included 18 consecutive patients who had an ILR implanted at our center because of recurrent unexplained syncope after extensive diagnostic tests between February 2006 and June 2011.

RESULTS

Diagnosis was confirmed in 10 (55.6%) of the 18 enrolled patients (13 males, 61±15 years). The confirmed diagnoses included sick sinus syndrome (n=6, 60%), advanced atrioventricular block (n=2, 20%) and ventricular tachyarrhythmia (n=2, 20%). The mean follow-up durations of the total study subjects and the diagnosed patients were 11.3±10.6 months and 5.6±9.2 months, respectively. Of the 10 diagnosed patients, 8 (80%) were diagnosed within 6 months of loop recorder implantation.

CONCLUSION

ILR may be a valuable and effective diagnostic tool for patients with unexplained syncope.

Для цитирования: Kang Gu Hyun, Oh Ju Hyeon, Chun Woo Jung, Park Yong Hwan, Song Bong Gun, Kim June Soo, On Young Keun, Park Seung Jung, Huh June. Usefulness of an implantable loop recorder in patients with syncope of an unknown cause.. Yonsei medical journal. 2013. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.3.590.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.