MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/00494755211064657

Медицинская библиотека · Tropical doctor · 2021

Prognostic factors for surgical site infection following intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia in adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.

Musonda Webster, Freitas Derek, Yamba Kaunda, Harrison William Jim, Munthali James

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Our study aimed to identify prognostic factors for surgical site infection following long bone fracture intramedullary nailing at a tertiary hospital in a low-resource setting. This was a longitudinal observational study involving 132 participants enrolled over a one-year period with femoral and tibial diaphyseal fractures scheduled for ORIF. Participant median age was 30 years (range: 26 - 42). The prevalence of surgical site infection was 16%. Male sex (AOR=0.26, 95% CI [0.70-0.98]; p = 0.047) was associated with lower odds of surgical site infection while associated non-musculoskeletal injuries were associated with higher odds of developing surgical site infection. Our study confirms a higher surgical site infection rate than normally accepted. However, intramedullary nailing in our setting is justified as it allows an early return to a pre-injury state. These interventions must be carried out in the best possible circumstances. Future studies could explore alternative methods of fracture fixation.

Для цитирования: Musonda Webster, Freitas Derek, Yamba Kaunda, Harrison William Jim, Munthali James. Prognostic factors for surgical site infection following intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia in adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.. Tropical doctor. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/00494755211064657.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.